Ethiopia PDR vs Melanesia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Melanesia
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 123,687 t against 2,217 t in Melanesia, a difference of 121,470 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 55.8 times Melanesia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Melanesia ranks 16th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73,783 t | 800.03 t | 72,983 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 93,687 t | 1,057 t | 92,629 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 100,192 t | 1,441 t | 98,751 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 111,141 t | 1,806 t | 109,335 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Melanesia?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 123,687 t against 2,217 t in Melanesia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Melanesia?
- 121,470 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Melanesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Melanesia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Melanesia ranks 16th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).