Ethiopia PDR vs Mexico: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Mexico
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 123,687 t against 108,408 t in Mexico, a difference of 15,279 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Mexico ranks 21st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73,783 t | 58,965 t | 14,818 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 93,687 t | 68,710 t | 24,976 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 100,192 t | 92,953 t | 7,239 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 111,141 t | 117,428 t | 6,287 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Mexico?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 123,687 t against 108,408 t in Mexico as of 1992.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Mexico?
- 15,279 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Mexico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Mexico rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Mexico ranks 21st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).