Ethiopia PDR vs Poland: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 143,599 t against 123,687 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 19,912 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Poland ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73,783 t | 185,781 t | 111,998 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 93,687 t | 211,557 t | 117,870 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 100,192 t | 219,908 t | 119,716 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 111,141 t | 197,159 t | 86,018 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Poland?
- Poland, at 143,599 t against 123,687 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Poland?
- 19,912 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Poland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Poland rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Poland ranks 18th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).