Ethiopia PDR vs Türkiye: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 142,655 t against 123,687 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 18,968 t.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.2 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Türkiye ranks 5th of 186 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73,783 t | 82,634 t | 8,851 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 93,687 t | 110,603 t | 16,916 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 100,192 t | 128,347 t | 28,155 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 111,141 t | 140,672 t | 29,531 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia PDR or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 142,655 t against 123,687 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia PDR and Türkiye?
- 18,968 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Türkiye?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Türkiye rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 19th and Türkiye ranks 5th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).