Ethiopia vs Indonesia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 248,100 t against 218,271 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 29,829 t.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Indonesia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 13th and Indonesia ranks 10th of 201 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 116,001 t | 404,746 t | 288,745 t | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 139,394 t | 210,088 t | 70,694 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 196,788 t | 221,921 t | 25,133 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 218,756 t | 246,975 t | 28,218 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 248,100 t against 218,271 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Indonesia?
- 29,829 t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Indonesia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Indonesia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 13th and Indonesia ranks 10th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).