Ethiopia vs Melanesia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Melanesia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 218,271 t against 2,217 t in Melanesia, a difference of 216,054 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 98.5 times Melanesia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 13th and Melanesia ranks 16th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 116,001 t | 2,122 t | 113,879 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 139,394 t | 1,875 t | 137,519 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 196,788 t | 2,090 t | 194,698 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 218,756 t | 2,233 t | 216,523 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Melanesia?
- Ethiopia, at 218,271 t against 2,217 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Melanesia?
- 216,054 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Melanesia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Melanesia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 13th and Melanesia ranks 16th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).