Ethiopia vs Republic of Moldova: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Ethiopia
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 218,271 t against 13,539 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 204,732 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 16.1 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 13th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 116,001 t | 18,327 t | 97,673 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 139,394 t | 15,355 t | 124,039 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 196,788 t | 14,015 t | 182,773 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 218,756 t | 13,510 t | 205,247 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Ethiopia or Republic of Moldova?
- Ethiopia, at 218,271 t against 13,539 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Ethiopia and Republic of Moldova?
- 204,732 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Republic of Moldova?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Republic of Moldova rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Ethiopia ranks 13th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).