France vs Thailand: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- France
- Thailand
How they compare
France currently reports 217,512 t against 205,224 t in Thailand, a difference of 12,288 t.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 14th and Thailand ranks 15th of 185 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 190,385 t | 49,113 t | 141,272 t | France |
| 1970s | 212,542 t | 72,162 t | 140,380 t | France |
| 1980s | 225,284 t | 105,097 t | 120,186 t | France |
| 1990s | 223,572 t | 156,472 t | 67,100 t | France |
| 2000s | 224,471 t | 182,295 t | 42,176 t | France |
| 2010s | 214,899 t | 198,162 t | 16,737 t | France |
| 2020s | 218,085 t | 203,783 t | 14,302 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, France or Thailand?
- France, at 217,512 t against 205,224 t in Thailand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between France and Thailand?
- 12,288 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do France and Thailand rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- France ranks 14th and Thailand ranks 15th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).