Georgia vs Melanesia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Georgia
- Melanesia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2,312 t against 2,217 t in Melanesia, a difference of 95 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 137th and Melanesia ranks 138th of 201 regions.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,871 t | 2,090 t | 2,781 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 3,901 t | 1,875 t | 2,026 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2,532 t | 2,090 t | 441.68 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 2,305 t | 2,233 t | 71.72 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Georgia or Melanesia?
- Georgia, at 2,312 t against 2,217 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Georgia and Melanesia?
- 95 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Melanesia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Melanesia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Georgia ranks 137th and Melanesia ranks 138th of 201 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).