Guatemala vs Uzbekistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Guatemala
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 15,557 t against 15,191 t in Guatemala, a difference of 366 t.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Guatemala ranks 74th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,212 t | 16,345 t | 4,133 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 14,865 t | 14,397 t | 468.01 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 15,024 t | 14,929 t | 95.14 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 15,573 t | 15,486 t | 87.2 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Guatemala or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 15,557 t against 15,191 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Guatemala and Uzbekistan?
- 366 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Uzbekistan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Guatemala ranks 74th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).