Haiti vs Sri Lanka: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Haiti
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 8,689 t against 8,463 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 226 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 96th and Sri Lanka ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,644 t | 3,624 t | 3,021 t | Haiti |
| 1970s | 7,618 t | 4,081 t | 3,538 t | Haiti |
| 1980s | 7,956 t | 4,406 t | 3,550 t | Haiti |
| 1990s | 8,429 t | 6,096 t | 2,333 t | Haiti |
| 2000s | 8,748 t | 7,006 t | 1,742 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 10,165 t | 9,169 t | 995.76 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 8,663 t | 8,675 t | 11.55 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Haiti or Sri Lanka?
- Haiti, at 8,689 t against 8,463 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Haiti and Sri Lanka?
- 226 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Sri Lanka rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Haiti ranks 96th and Sri Lanka ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).