Hungary vs Malaysia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Hungary
- Malaysia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 43,759 t against 40,570 t in Malaysia, a difference of 3,189 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 46th and Malaysia ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 64,695 t | 5,609 t | 59,086 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 79,010 t | 10,231 t | 68,779 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 80,650 t | 18,613 t | 62,037 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 54,113 t | 34,499 t | 19,614 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 50,781 t | 31,187 t | 19,595 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 45,380 t | 38,433 t | 6,947 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 43,224 t | 40,227 t | 2,997 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Hungary or Malaysia?
- Hungary, at 43,759 t against 40,570 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Hungary and Malaysia?
- 3,189 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Malaysia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Hungary ranks 46th and Malaysia ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).