Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 102,206 t against 79,148 t in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 23,058 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.3 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 18 regions.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran (Islamic Republic of) | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 72,736 t | 99,077 t | 26,341 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 76,775 t | 102,274 t | 25,499 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 102,206 t against 79,148 t in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Sudan?
- 23,058 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).