Iraq vs Malawi: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Iraq
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 22,876 t against 21,055 t in Iraq, a difference of 1,821 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 64th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,382 t | 3,526 t | 5,857 t | Iraq |
| 1970s | 13,228 t | 4,838 t | 8,390 t | Iraq |
| 1980s | 18,335 t | 6,432 t | 11,903 t | Iraq |
| 1990s | 18,137 t | 10,554 t | 7,582 t | Iraq |
| 2000s | 16,081 t | 16,348 t | 266.54 t | Malawi |
| 2010s | 19,978 t | 20,263 t | 285.04 t | Malawi |
| 2020s | 20,774 t | 22,715 t | 1,941 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Iraq or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 22,876 t against 21,055 t in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Iraq and Malawi?
- 1,821 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Malawi rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Iraq ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 64th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).