Iraq vs Uruguay: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Iraq
- Uruguay
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 21,055 t against 16,589 t in Uruguay, a difference of 4,466 t.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Iraq ranks 77th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,382 t | 14,055 t | 4,672 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 13,228 t | 10,872 t | 2,356 t | Iraq |
| 1980s | 18,335 t | 8,970 t | 9,365 t | Iraq |
| 1990s | 18,137 t | 10,189 t | 7,948 t | Iraq |
| 2000s | 16,081 t | 12,697 t | 3,384 t | Iraq |
| 2010s | 19,978 t | 17,593 t | 2,385 t | Iraq |
| 2020s | 20,774 t | 16,456 t | 4,318 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Iraq or Uruguay?
- Iraq, at 21,055 t against 16,589 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Iraq and Uruguay?
- 4,466 t, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Uruguay rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Iraq ranks 77th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).