Jamaica vs Mauritania: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jamaica
- Mauritania
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1,252 t against 1,168 t in Mauritania, a difference of 84 t.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 185 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,501 t | 364.79 t | 1,136 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 1,710 t | 319.93 t | 1,390 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 1,628 t | 502.7 t | 1,125 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 1,892 t | 939.66 t | 952.01 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 1,688 t | 1,005 t | 682.99 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,268 t | 1,110 t | 157.75 t | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 1,249 t | 1,164 t | 85.6 t | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Jamaica or Mauritania?
- Jamaica, at 1,252 t against 1,168 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 84 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Mauritania rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Jamaica ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 138th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).