Jamaica vs Norway: Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Jamaica
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1,416 t against 1,252 t in Jamaica, a difference of 164 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Jamaica ranks 137th and Norway ranks 135th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,501 t | 2,491 t | 990 t | Norway |
| 1970s | 1,710 t | 3,125 t | 1,415 t | Norway |
| 1980s | 1,628 t | 3,087 t | 1,460 t | Norway |
| 1990s | 1,892 t | 2,208 t | 316.67 t | Norway |
| 2000s | 1,688 t | 1,602 t | 86.37 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,268 t | 1,443 t | 175.15 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 1,249 t | 1,413 t | 164.15 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen, Jamaica or Norway?
- Norway, at 1,416 t against 1,252 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen between Jamaica and Norway?
- 164 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Norway rank globally for atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen?
- Jamaica ranks 137th and Norway ranks 135th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).