Kazakhstan vs Sudan (former): Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 95,276 t against 83,966 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 11,310 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 25th and Sudan (former) ranks 24th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 131,852 t | 87,474 t | 44,378 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 91,745 t | 91,954 t | 209.33 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 84,605 t | 99,158 t | 14,552 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 95,276 t against 83,966 t in Kazakhstan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 11,310 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan (former) rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 25th and Sudan (former) ranks 24th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).