Kazakhstan vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 102,206 t against 83,966 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 18,240 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 89,397 t | 99,077 t | 9,680 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 85,244 t | 102,274 t | 17,030 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 102,206 t against 83,966 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 18,240 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).