Kiribati vs Suriname: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kiribati
- Suriname
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 61.78 t against 56.53 t in Suriname, a difference of 5.25 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 168th and Suriname ranks 170th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 73.85 t | 33.58 t | 40.27 t | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 73.46 t | 41.7 t | 31.77 t | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 74.92 t | 61.39 t | 13.53 t | Kiribati |
| 1990s | 74.54 t | 81.59 t | 7.04 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 61.39 t | 64.52 t | 3.13 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 61.68 t | 73.03 t | 11.35 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 61.69 t | 62.56 t | 0.8757 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Kiribati or Suriname?
- Kiribati, at 61.78 t against 56.53 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Kiribati and Suriname?
- 5.25 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Suriname rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Kiribati ranks 168th and Suriname ranks 170th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).