Lithuania vs Peru: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Lithuania
- Peru
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 13,889 t against 13,497 t in Peru, a difference of 392 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 78th and Peru ranks 81st of 186 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,179 t | 8,477 t | 10,702 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 11,796 t | 10,644 t | 1,152 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 13,517 t | 11,751 t | 1,766 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 13,840 t | 13,685 t | 154.43 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Lithuania or Peru?
- Lithuania, at 13,889 t against 13,497 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Lithuania and Peru?
- 392 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Peru rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Lithuania ranks 78th and Peru ranks 81st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).