Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 487.08 t against 438.83 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 48.25 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 159th and Mauritius ranks 157th of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 451.32 t | 521.13 t | 69.81 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 434.63 t | 482.57 t | 47.94 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 439.11 t | 485.76 t | 46.64 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 487.08 t against 438.83 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 48.25 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Luxembourg ranks 159th and Mauritius ranks 157th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).