Mexico vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mexico
- Sudan
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 108,408 t against 102,206 t in Sudan, a difference of 6,202 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 23rd and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 119,271 t | 99,077 t | 20,194 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 111,908 t | 102,274 t | 9,634 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Mexico or Sudan?
- Mexico, at 108,408 t against 102,206 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Mexico and Sudan?
- 6,202 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Mexico ranks 23rd and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).