Myanmar vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Myanmar
- Sudan
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 120,408 t against 102,206 t in Sudan, a difference of 18,202 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Myanmar ranks 22nd and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 103,878 t | 99,077 t | 4,801 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 118,174 t | 102,274 t | 15,900 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Myanmar or Sudan?
- Myanmar, at 120,408 t against 102,206 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Myanmar and Sudan?
- 18,202 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Myanmar ranks 22nd and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).