New Caledonia vs Samoa: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- New Caledonia
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 22.47 t against 4.45 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 18.02 t.
That makes Samoa's figure about 5.1 times New Caledonia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 196th and Samoa ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.88 t | 27.82 t | 24.94 t | Samoa |
| 1970s | 4.26 t | 32.17 t | 27.92 t | Samoa |
| 1980s | 4.72 t | 35.46 t | 30.74 t | Samoa |
| 1990s | 5.32 t | 25.97 t | 20.64 t | Samoa |
| 2000s | 5.05 t | 19.92 t | 14.87 t | Samoa |
| 2010s | 4.62 t | 26.24 t | 21.62 t | Samoa |
| 2020s | 4.45 t | 22.45 t | 18 t | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, New Caledonia or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 22.47 t against 4.45 t in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between New Caledonia and Samoa?
- 18.02 t, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Samoa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do New Caledonia and Samoa rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- New Caledonia ranks 196th and Samoa ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).