Papua New Guinea vs Slovenia: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Slovenia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1,689 t against 1,675 t in Slovenia, a difference of 14 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 131st and Slovenia ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,439 t | 1,442 t | 2.07 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 1,345 t | 1,556 t | 210.85 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 1,561 t | 1,717 t | 156.84 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 1,706 t | 1,675 t | 30.88 t | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Papua New Guinea or Slovenia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1,689 t against 1,675 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
- 14 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Slovenia rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 131st and Slovenia ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).