Peru vs Slovak Republic: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Peru
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Peru currently reports 13,497 t against 13,356 t in Slovak Republic, a difference of 141 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Peru ranks 81st and Slovak Republic ranks 82nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Slovak Republic in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,730 t | 17,001 t | 8,272 t | Slovak Republic |
| 2000s | 10,644 t | 15,533 t | 4,890 t | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 11,751 t | 14,033 t | 2,282 t | Slovak Republic |
| 2020s | 13,685 t | 13,448 t | 237.3 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Peru or Slovak Republic?
- Peru, at 13,497 t against 13,356 t in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Peru and Slovak Republic?
- 141 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Slovak Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Slovak Republic rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Peru ranks 81st and Slovak Republic ranks 82nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).