Samoa vs Singapore: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Samoa
- Singapore
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 22.47 t against 12.28 t in Singapore, a difference of 10.19 t.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.8 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.
Samoa ranks 193rd and Singapore ranks 194th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27.82 t | 67.8 t | 39.98 t | Singapore |
| 1970s | 32.17 t | 59.63 t | 27.46 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 35.46 t | 45.44 t | 9.98 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 25.97 t | 17.53 t | 8.44 t | Samoa |
| 2000s | 19.92 t | 15.15 t | 4.77 t | Samoa |
| 2010s | 26.24 t | 12.71 t | 13.53 t | Samoa |
| 2020s | 22.45 t | 12.21 t | 10.24 t | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Samoa or Singapore?
- Samoa, at 22.47 t against 12.28 t in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Samoa and Singapore?
- 10.19 t, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Samoa and Singapore rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Samoa ranks 193rd and Singapore ranks 194th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).