Serbia vs Uruguay: Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 21,604 t against 16,589 t in Uruguay, a difference of 5,015 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 75th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,516 t | 14,094 t | 7,422 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 20,877 t | 17,593 t | 3,284 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 21,590 t | 16,456 t | 5,134 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Serbia, at 21,604 t against 16,589 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 5,015 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen?
- Serbia ranks 75th and Uruguay ranks 78th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).