South Sudan vs Uzbekistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- South Sudan
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 15,557 t against 15,289 t in South Sudan, a difference of 268 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 73rd and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15,703 t | 14,910 t | 793.2 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 15,244 t | 15,486 t | 242 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, South Sudan or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 15,557 t against 15,289 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between South Sudan and Uzbekistan?
- 268 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Uzbekistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Uzbekistan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- South Sudan ranks 73rd and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).