Spain vs Sudan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Spain
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 102,206 t against 97,299 t in Spain, a difference of 4,907 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 26th and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 101,572 t | 99,077 t | 2,495 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 95,950 t | 102,274 t | 6,323 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Spain or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 102,206 t against 97,299 t in Spain as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Spain and Sudan?
- 4,907 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Spain and Sudan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Spain ranks 26th and Sudan ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).