Syrian Arab Republic vs Ukraine: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 242,736 t against 26,236 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 216,500 t.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 9.3 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 11th of 18 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23,880 t | 303,974 t | 280,094 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 24,154 t | 243,681 t | 219,527 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 28,572 t | 238,532 t | 209,960 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 26,723 t | 242,780 t | 216,057 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Syrian Arab Republic or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 242,736 t against 26,236 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Syrian Arab Republic and Ukraine?
- 216,500 t, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Ukraine rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 11th of 18 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).