Tunisia vs Zambia: Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Tunisia
- Zambia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 26,103 t against 23,666 t in Zambia, a difference of 2,437 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.
Tunisia ranks 59th and Zambia ranks 61st of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tunisia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,149 t | 10,046 t | 897.39 t | Zambia |
| 1970s | 13,909 t | 12,358 t | 1,551 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 18,413 t | 13,190 t | 5,223 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 22,761 t | 16,260 t | 6,502 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 25,905 t | 17,317 t | 8,588 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 26,341 t | 23,075 t | 3,266 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 26,099 t | 23,654 t | 2,445 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen, Tunisia or Zambia?
- Tunisia, at 26,103 t against 23,666 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen between Tunisia and Zambia?
- 2,437 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Tunisia and Zambia rank globally for atmospheric deposition β cropland nitrogen?
- Tunisia ranks 59th and Zambia ranks 61st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).