Uruguay vs Uzbekistan: Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen
Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 16,589 t against 15,557 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1,032 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Uruguay ranks 69th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Uruguay averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,524 t | 16,345 t | 5,821 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 12,697 t | 14,397 t | 1,700 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 17,593 t | 14,929 t | 2,664 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 16,456 t | 15,486 t | 969.88 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen, Uruguay or Uzbekistan?
- Uruguay, at 16,589 t against 15,557 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen between Uruguay and Uzbekistan?
- 1,032 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Uruguay and Uzbekistan rank globally for atmospheric deposition — cropland nitrogen?
- Uruguay ranks 69th and Uzbekistan ranks 71st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Atmospheric deposition — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).