China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Lithuania: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
16.6%
in 2025
Lithuania
95.1%
in 2025
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region rank
21st
Lithuania rank
21st

Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time

  • China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
  • Lithuania
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 95.1% against 16.6% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a difference of 78.5%.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 5.7 times China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 21st and Lithuania ranks 21st of 23 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 16.6% 70.2% 53.6% Lithuania
2010s 16.6% 86.3% 69.7% Lithuania
2020s 16.6% 92.2% 75.5% Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 95.1% against 16.6% in China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Lithuania?
78.5%, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Lithuania?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Lithuania rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ranks 21st and Lithuania ranks 21st of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Lithuania: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-freshwater-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-freshwater-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/china-hong-kong-special-administrative-region/lithuania/">China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region vs Lithuania: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
197 places, 5,122 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed