Egypt vs New Zealand: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Egypt
26.1%
in 2025
New Zealand
24.5%
in 2025
Egypt rank
140th
New Zealand rank
143rd
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Egypt
- New Zealand
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 26.1% against 24.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 140th and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 174 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.1% | 19.5% | 6.6% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 26.1% | 23.7% | 2.5% | Egypt |
| 2020s | 26.1% | 24.5% | 1.6% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), Egypt or New Zealand?
- Egypt, at 26.1% against 24.5% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Egypt and New Zealand?
- 1.6%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and New Zealand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and New Zealand rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Egypt ranks 140th and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.