El Salvador vs Latvia: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
El Salvador
97.7%
in 2025
Latvia
97.4%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
16th
Latvia rank
17th
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- El Salvador
- Latvia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 97.7% against 97.4% in Latvia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 17th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.4% | 80.5% | 55.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 97.7% | 97.4% | 0.3% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 97.7% | 97.4% | 0.3% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), El Salvador or Latvia?
- El Salvador, at 97.7% against 97.4% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between El Salvador and Latvia?
- 0.3%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Latvia rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- El Salvador ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 17th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.