Ghana vs Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Ghana
94.9%
in 2025
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
94.1%
in 2025
Ghana rank
22nd
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands rank
25th
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Ghana
- Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 94.9% against 94.1% in Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 22nd and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ranks 25th of 174 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.9% | 37.1% | 57.9% | Ghana |
| 2010s | 94.9% | 93.4% | 1.6% | Ghana |
| 2020s | 94.9% | 94.0% | 1.0% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), Ghana or Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands?
- Ghana, at 94.9% against 94.1% in Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Ghana and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands?
- 0.8%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Ghana ranks 22nd and Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands ranks 25th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.