Hungary vs Namibia: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Hungary
86.5%
in 2025
Namibia
86.3%
in 2025
Hungary rank
34th
Namibia rank
36th
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Hungary
- Namibia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 86.5% against 86.3% in Namibia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 34th and Namibia ranks 36th of 150 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.5% | 59.6% | 13.0% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 86.5% | 84.5% | 2.0% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 86.5% | 86.2% | 0.3% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), Hungary or Namibia?
- Hungary, at 86.5% against 86.3% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Hungary and Namibia?
- 0.2%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Namibia rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Hungary ranks 34th and Namibia ranks 36th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.