Israel vs New Zealand: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Israel
26.0%
in 2025
New Zealand
24.5%
in 2025
Israel rank
141st
New Zealand rank
143rd
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Israel
- New Zealand
How they compare
Israel currently reports 26.0% against 24.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.
Israel ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.5% | 19.5% | 2.0% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 22.5% | 23.7% | 1.1% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 25.3% | 24.5% | 0.8% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), Israel or New Zealand?
- Israel, at 26.0% against 24.5% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Israel and New Zealand?
- 1.5%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Zealand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Israel and New Zealand rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Israel ranks 141st and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.