Lithuania vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

Lithuania
95.1%
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
0.1%
in 2025
Lithuania rank
21st
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
23rd

Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 95.1% against 0.1% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 95.0%.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 742.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 21st and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd of 174 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2000s 70.2% 0.1% 70.2% Lithuania
2010s 86.3% 0.1% 86.2% Lithuania
2020s 92.2% 0.1% 92.0% Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), Lithuania or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Lithuania, at 95.1% against 0.1% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Lithuania and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
95.0%, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
Lithuania ranks 21st and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-freshwater-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/lithuania/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-freshwater-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/lithuania/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Lithuania vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
197 places, 5,122 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed