Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Poland: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
0.1%
in 2025
Poland
94.2%
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
23rd
Poland rank
24th

Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time

  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
  • Poland
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Poland currently reports 94.2% against 0.1% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 94.1%.

That makes Poland's figure about 735.4 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 24th of 23 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1% 72.9% 72.8% Poland
2010s 0.1% 94.1% 93.9% Poland
2020s 0.1% 94.1% 94.0% Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas), Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Poland?
Poland, at 94.2% against 0.1% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Poland?
94.1%, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Poland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Poland rank globally for average proportion of freshwater key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 24th of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Poland: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-freshwater-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-freshwater-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/poland/">Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Poland: Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
197 places, 5,122 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed