American Samoa vs New Caledonia: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
American Samoa
69.2%
in 2025
New Caledonia
66.5%
in 2025
American Samoa rank
55th
New Caledonia rank
59th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- American Samoa
- New Caledonia
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 69.2% against 66.5% in New Caledonia, a difference of 2.7%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, American Samoa has been ahead every year.
American Samoa ranks 55th and New Caledonia ranks 59th of 201 countries.
American Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.2% | 5.2% | 64.0% | American Samoa |
| 2010s | 69.2% | 52.5% | 16.7% | American Samoa |
| 2020s | 69.2% | 66.5% | 2.6% | American Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, American Samoa or New Caledonia?
- American Samoa, at 69.2% against 66.5% in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between American Samoa and New Caledonia?
- 2.7%, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and New Caledonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do American Samoa and New Caledonia rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- American Samoa ranks 55th and New Caledonia ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.