Aruba vs Latvia: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Aruba
93.8%
in 2025
Latvia
96.1%
in 2025
Aruba rank
16th
Latvia rank
14th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Aruba
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 96.1% against 93.8% in Aruba, a difference of 2.3%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 14th of 177 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 69.9% | 69.9% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 96.1% | 96.1% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 46.9% | 96.1% | 49.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Aruba or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 96.1% against 93.8% in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Aruba and Latvia?
- 2.3%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Latvia rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Aruba ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 14th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.