Aruba vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by

Aruba
93.8%
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
24.9%
in 2025
Aruba rank
18th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
20th

Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time

  • Aruba
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 93.8% against 24.9% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 68.9%.

That makes Aruba's figure about 3.8 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ahead.

Aruba ranks 18th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 20th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 10.3% 10.3% Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2010s 0.0% 21.3% 21.3% Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
2020s 46.9% 24.5% 22.5% Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Aruba or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Aruba, at 93.8% against 24.9% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Aruba and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
68.9%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Aruba and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
Aruba ranks 18th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 20th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/aruba/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-marine-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/aruba/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Aruba vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
223 places, 5,798 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed