Australia vs Jersey: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Australia
66.2%
in 2025
Jersey
64.1%
in 2025
Australia rank
57th
Jersey rank
60th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Australia
- Jersey
How they compare
Australia currently reports 66.2% against 64.1% in Jersey, a difference of 2.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jersey ahead.
Australia ranks 57th and Jersey ranks 60th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Jersey in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Jersey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.2% | 63.6% | 17.3% | Jersey |
| 2010s | 60.7% | 64.0% | 3.3% | Jersey |
| 2020s | 65.8% | 64.1% | 1.7% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Australia or Jersey?
- Australia, at 66.2% against 64.1% in Jersey as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Australia and Jersey?
- 2.1%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Jersey?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Jersey rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Australia ranks 57th and Jersey ranks 60th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.