Bahamas vs Greenland: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Bahamas
30.2%
in 2025
Greenland
29.6%
in 2025
Bahamas rank
135th
Greenland rank
137th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Bahamas
- Greenland
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Greenland ahead.
Bahamas ranks 135th and Greenland ranks 137th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.7% | 26.2% | 18.5% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 19.7% | 29.2% | 9.5% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 30.2% | 29.6% | 0.6% | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Bahamas or Greenland?
- Bahamas, at 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Bahamas and Greenland?
- 0.6%, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Greenland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Bahamas and Greenland rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Bahamas ranks 135th and Greenland ranks 137th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.