Chile vs Greenland: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Chile
28.1%
in 2025
Greenland
29.6%
in 2025
Chile rank
127th
Greenland rank
126th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Chile
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 29.6% against 28.1% in Chile, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 127th and Greenland ranks 126th of 177 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 26.2% | 11.0% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 18.6% | 29.2% | 10.6% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 26.0% | 29.6% | 3.6% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Chile or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 29.6% against 28.1% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Chile and Greenland?
- 1.5%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Greenland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Greenland rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Chile ranks 127th and Greenland ranks 126th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.