China vs Lebanon: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
China
8.8%
in 2025
Lebanon
10.9%
in 2025
China rank
151st
Lebanon rank
149th
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- China
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 10.9% against 8.8% in China, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.2 times China's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
China ranks 151st and Lebanon ranks 149th of 177 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.9% | 9.8% | 4.9% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 6.8% | 10.5% | 3.7% | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 10.9% | 2.7% | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, China or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 10.9% against 8.8% in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between China and Lebanon?
- 2.1%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lebanon?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do China and Lebanon rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- China ranks 151st and Lebanon ranks 149th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.