Comoros vs Iceland: Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by
Comoros
13.7%
in 2025
Iceland
16.1%
in 2025
Comoros rank
145th
Iceland rank
142nd
Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by over time
- Comoros
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 16.1% against 13.7% in Comoros, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Comoros ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 142nd of 177 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 10.2% | 10.2% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 13.7% | 14.1% | 0.4% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 13.7% | 15.9% | 2.2% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by, Comoros or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 16.1% against 13.7% in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by between Comoros and Iceland?
- 2.4%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Iceland rank globally for average proportion of marine key biodiversity areas (kbas) covered by?
- Comoros ranks 145th and Iceland ranks 142nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.